Does El Niño Mean More Snow? What 56 Winters of Data Say for Your City
A Super El Niño is forecast for winter 2026-27 — and for most of America's snowiest cities, history says that means less snow, not more. The exception runs straight down the Mid-Atlantic, where El Niño is a snow-maker. Here's what 30 cities actually did across the strong El Niño winters since 1970.
The short answer to “does El Niño mean more snow?” is: usually less, if you live up north. We totaled December-through-February snowfall at the primary NOAA station in 30 US cities and compared the eight strong and very-strong El Niño winters since 1970 against each city's long-run normal. Buffalo averaged 33% less winter snow in El Niño years, Boston 34% less, and Indianapolis a startling 51% less — while Washington, DC averaged 38% more and Richmond 37% more.
That split isn't random. El Niño reshapes the winter jet stream in a consistent way: it starves the northern storm track that the Great Lakes and Upper Midwest live on, and it feeds the southern one that drives the big coastal snowstorms up the I-95 corridor. So the honest forecast for a snow-lover depends on your ZIP code. A Super El Niño is bad news if you shovel in Minneapolis or Buffalo, and a wildcard — often a good one — if you're in DC, Richmond or Philadelphia. The full ranked table is first; the mechanism, the caveats, and what it means for this specific winter follow.
El Niño Snowfall by City: Biggest Losers to Biggest Gainers
Mean DJF (Dec–Feb) snowfall at each city's primary NOAA station, comparing all winters 1971–2026 against the eight strong El Niño winters since 1970. Negative means El Niño winters ran drier than normal; positive means snowier. Ranked driest-relative to snowiest-relative.
| City | Normal DJF snow | El Niño DJF snow | El Niño anomaly | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indianapolis, INIndianapolis Intl | 20.7″ | 10.1″ | -51% | Interior / Great Lakes |
| St. Louis, MOLambert Intl | 14.6″ | 9.6″ | -34% | Interior / Great Lakes |
| Boston, MABoston Logan | 34.1″ | 22.5″ | -34% | Northeast |
| Buffalo, NYBuffalo Niagara | 71.1″ | 47.8″ | -33% | Lake Erie snow belt |
| Cleveland, OHCleveland Hopkins | 43.2″ | 33.0″ | -24% | Lake Erie snow belt |
| Detroit, MIDetroit Metro | 33.5″ | 25.6″ | -24% | Great Lakes |
| Boise, IDBoise Air Term | 15.0″ | 11.5″ | -23% | Interior West |
| Milwaukee, WIMitchell AP | 36.5″ | 29.4″ | -19% | Great Lakes |
| Columbus, OHJohn Glenn Intl | 21.1″ | 17.0″ | -19% | Interior / Great Lakes |
| Fargo, NDFargo Hector | 27.9″ | 22.6″ | -19% | Northern Plains |
| Raleigh, NCRDU | 4.9″ | 4.0″ | -18% | Southern tier |
| New York, NYCentral Park | 21.0″ | 17.7″ | -16% | Northeast coast |
| Pittsburgh, PAPittsburgh Intl | 30.8″ | 26.2″ | -15% | Appalachia |
| Syracuse, NYSyracuse Hancock | 88.0″ | 75.2″ | -15% | Central NY snow belt |
| Minneapolis, MNMSP Intl | 31.8″ | 27.6″ | -13% | Upper Midwest |
| Chicago, ILO'Hare Intl | 28.8″ | 25.5″ | -11% | Great Lakes |
| Salt Lake City, UTSLC Intl | 34.0″ | 31.9″ | -6% | Great Basin |
| Kansas City, MOKC Intl | 14.7″ | 14.5″ | -1% | Central Plains |
| Nashville, TNNashville Intl | 5.7″ | 5.9″ | +2% | Mid-South |
| Denver, CODenver-Stapleton | 22.4″ | 23.3″ | +4% | High Plains |
| Des Moines, IADes Moines Intl | 26.3″ | 28.0″ | +6% | Upper Midwest |
| Charlotte, NCCharlotte Douglas | 3.7″ | 4.3″ | +14% | Southern tier |
| Philadelphia, PAPhila Intl | 17.7″ | 20.7″ | +17% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Albuquerque, NMAlbuquerque Intl | 6.7″ | 8.2″ | +23% | Southwest |
| Memphis, TNMemphis Intl | 3.4″ | 4.2″ | +23% | Mid-South |
| Oklahoma City, OKWill Rogers | 6.8″ | 9.2″ | +35% | Southern Plains |
| Richmond, VARichmond Intl | 8.9″ | 12.2″ | +37% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Washington, DCReagan National | 12.1″ | 16.7″ | +38% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Atlanta, GAHartsfield | 1.5″ | 2.4″ | +59% | Southern tier |
| Dallas, TXDFW | 1.9″ | 3.1″ | +63% | Southern tier |
Snowfall is NOAA GHCN-Daily, measured at the airport ASOS in nearly every case (New York uses the long-running Central Park record, Denver the continuous Stapleton record). Each El Niño average uses seven or eight winters, depending on data completeness. Southern cities carry small totals, so a big percent swing can be an inch or two — read their raw inches alongside the percentage. You can pull the daily snow record for any of these on our city pages, e.g. Chicago or Denver.
The Northern Snow Belt Loses — and It's Not Close
Fifteen of our 30 cities averaged at least 13% less DJF snow in strong El Niño winters, and almost every one of them sits across the northern half of the country. The mechanism is the part people miss when they assume “big El Niño = big winter.” A strong El Niño warms the eastern tropical Pacific, which reliably lifts the polar jet stream north and keeps it there. That does two things to the north: it bottles up the Arctic air behind the jet instead of unloading it into the Lower 48, and it cuts down on the fast-moving “clipper” systems that drop quick several-inch snows across the Midwest and Great Lakes. NOAA's Climate Prediction Center describes the same setup in its ENSO monitoring materials.
Lake-effect cities take the clearest hit, because lake-effect snow needs repeated blasts of cold air crossing still-warm water. Fewer cold outbreaks means fewer lake-effect events, which is why Buffalo (−33%) and Cleveland (−24%) fall so far below normal despite being the snowiest big cities in the East. Interior cities tell the same story a little more quietly: Detroit −24%, Milwaukee, Columbus and Fargo all around −19%, Minneapolis −13%, Chicago −11%. The two biggest losers, Indianapolis (−51%) and St. Louis (−34%), sit at the southern edge of the reliable snow zone, where a milder El Niño pattern tips a lot of would-be snow over to cold rain.
| Northern city | El Niño snow vs normal |
|---|---|
| Indianapolis, IN | -51% |
| St. Louis, MO | -34% |
| Boston, MA | -34% |
| Buffalo, NY | -33% |
| Cleveland, OH | -24% |
| Detroit, MI | -24% |
| Boise, ID | -23% |
| Milwaukee, WI | -19% |
| Columbus, OH | -19% |
| Fargo, ND | -19% |
| Raleigh, NC | -18% |
| New York, NY | -16% |
| Pittsburgh, PA | -15% |
| Syracuse, NY | -15% |
| Minneapolis, MN | -13% |
Where El Niño Actually Makes Snow: the Mid-Atlantic
Flip the map south of the Mason-Dixon line and the sign flips with it. The same jet-stream shift that starves the Great Lakes supercharges the southern, sub-tropical branch of the jet — the one that spins up coastal “Miller A” storms off the Carolinas and runs them up the East Coast. When those storms meet just enough cold air over the Mid-Atlantic, they bury it.
| Mid-Atlantic city | Normal | El Niño anomaly |
|---|---|---|
| Philadelphia, PA | 17.7″ | +17% |
| Richmond, VA | 8.9″ | +37% |
| Washington, DC | 12.1″ | +38% |
This is the data behind a fact every DC-area snow-weenie already knows in their bones: the region's monster winters skew El Niño. The 2009-10 “Snowmageddon” winter, which buried Washington and Baltimore under back-to-back blockbusters, was a strong El Niño. So was the record 2015-16 winter that produced the January blizzard “Jonas.” Our numbers put Washington 38% above normal and Richmond 37% above across the strong El Niño set — the clearest positive signal of any region in the country.
The Southern Tier Is a Wildcard, Not a Jackpot
Dallas (+63%), Atlanta (+59%) and Oklahoma City (+35%) top the percentage gains, and it's tempting to read that as “the South gets hammered in El Niño.” Don't. These are tiny baselines: Dallas's “63% more” is the difference between averaging 1.9 inches a winter and 3.1. What's real is that the active southern storm track gives the Sun Belt more chances at a rare snow or ice event — the kind that shuts down a city that owns almost no plows. An El Niño winter is when Dallas or Atlanta is most likely to get its once-in-a-few-years snowstorm, even though the seasonal total stays small. Raleigh is the odd one out at −18%; its few El Niño winters in the record happened to run warm, a reminder that small samples on small totals are noisy.
One Winter Can Blow Up the Average
Everything above is an average over seven or eight winters, and that smoothing hides how wild the spread is. Chicago is the cleanest example: it averages 11% below normal in El Niño, but its eight El Niño winters ranged from a measly 7.2 inches in 1997-98 to a buried 52.4 inches in 2009-10 — one of its snowier modern winters, inside a strong El Niño. El Niño strength matters too. The very-strong years (1982-83, 1997-98, 2015-16, 2023-24) tend to show the pattern most sharply; weaker ones are muddier. The takeaway isn't “El Niño guarantees a dry winter in the north.” It's that over many winters, the odds tilt the way the table shows — and the cold air still has to show up at the right time for any of it to fall as snow.
What the 2026-27 Super El Niño Means
This isn't a normal El Niño. NOAA's Climate Prediction Center put the odds of a historic-strength (very strong) event this winter above 83% in its October 8 outlook — a Super El Niño in the class of 1997-98 and 2015-16. If 2026-27 tracks the strong-El-Niño pattern in this table, the lean is: a milder, lower-snow winter for the Great Lakes and Upper Midwest, an active and potentially big-snow season for the Mid-Atlantic from Richmond through Washington to Philadelphia, and elevated odds of a disruptive one-off snow or ice event across the South. For the temperature-and-precipitation side of the same forecast, see our Super El Niño winter outlook for 21 cities, and for where the Pacific actually stands right now, our El Niño 2026 tracker.
Check Your Own City — and Tell Us How This Winter Goes
If your city isn't in the table, you can reconstruct its El Niño snow history yourself. Use our weather-on-this-day lookup to pull the snow on any past date, and watch this winter's snow records land in near-real time on our records-broken tracker. We'll be back in spring 2027 to grade this forecast against what actually fell — if your city busts the pattern, that's the number we want to hear about. For how much snow these cities get in a normal year, see the snowiest cities in America, and for when that snow usually starts, when it starts snowing by city. It all ties back to the US weather records hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does El Niño mean more or less snow?
It depends entirely on where you live. In the northern snow belt — the Great Lakes, interior Northeast and Upper Midwest — strong El Niño winters have historically brought less snow, because El Niño weakens the northern storm track and the Arctic outbreaks that feed lake-effect snow. In our NOAA data, Buffalo averaged 33% less DJF snow and Boston 34% less across the eight strong El Niño winters since 1970. The Mid-Atlantic is the exception: Washington, DC averaged 38% more.
Will it snow more this winter (2026-27)?
A Super (very strong) El Niño is forecast for winter 2026-27 — NOAA’s October 8 outlook put the odds of historic strength above 83%. If this winter follows the strong-El-Niño pattern in our data, the northern tier (Minneapolis, Buffalo, Boston, the Great Lakes) would tend toward less snow than usual, while the Mid-Atlantic corridor from Richmond to Washington to Philadelphia is where the heaviest snow odds shift. Any single winter varies, so treat it as a lean, not a lock.
Which US cities get more snow in an El Niño?
The Mid-Atlantic benefits most: in strong El Niño winters, Washington, DC averaged 38% more snow, Richmond 37% more and Philadelphia 17% more, because El Niño energizes the southern/sub-tropical jet and the coastal "Miller" storms that bury the I-95 corridor. Southern cities like Dallas, Atlanta and Oklahoma City also see a relative jump, but off tiny baselines — Dallas goes from about 1.9 inches a winter to 3.1.
Why does El Niño reduce snow in the Great Lakes and Upper Midwest?
El Niño tends to pull the polar jet stream north and keep it there, which suppresses the cold Arctic air masses and the fast-moving clipper systems the northern US relies on for snow. Warm Great Lakes need repeated cold outbreaks to generate lake-effect snow; in El Niño winters those outbreaks come less often, so Buffalo, Cleveland and Detroit run below their snow normals.
Is El Niño the same thing as a snowy winter?
No. El Niño sets the odds, not the outcome. Chicago averaged 11% below normal across strong El Niño winters, yet the 2009-10 El Niño winter dumped 52 inches on O’Hare — well above normal — while the 1997-98 El Niño gave it just 7. The signal is a tilt in the probabilities over many winters, and the strength of the El Niño and the timing of cold air in any given year can override it.
Sources & Method
Snowfall: NOAA GHCN-Daily via our database (1970–present). For each city we totaled December–February snowfall at its primary long-record station (winter labeled by its January year; snow converted from millimetres to inches; days flagged as bad SNOW readings excluded; a winter must report at least 80 of its ~90 DJF days to count), then compared the mean across all qualifying winters 1971–2026 with the mean across the strong and very-strong El Niño winters since 1970. El Niño winters and their strength (Strong ≥ 1.5, Very Strong ≥ 2.0 peak) are from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center Oceanic Niño Index as compiled at ggweather.com/enso/oni.htm: 1972-73, 1982-83, 1987-88, 1991-92, 1997-98, 2009-10, 2015-16 and 2023-24. The 2026-27 strength outlook is from the NOAA CPC ENSO Diagnostic Discussion. This is a station-level analysis, not a full metro average, and small-total southern cities carry more year-to-year noise. See our data sources & methodology page. Data verified October 17, 2026.